YHWH Name
The Father and his Son has the very same name (YHWH)!
Jeremiah 23:6 is very specific as to what the name of the Son is!
YHWH is one and his name is one!
If there were many gods with the name YHWH, which one would you be calling on for salvation?
But if
there was only one YHWH and his name one, it would separate him from all the others and give him glory for everything!
His name is who he is! He is his name!
The same is true with his son! Only one person can have the
son's name, and that is the son!
There is only one name under heaven and there cannot be two names under
heaven! For salvation!
There cannot be several people with the son's name, no more then there can be
several gods with the father's name!
Only 1 name of one person will hook you up with the one who shed his
blood for you!
The glory and praise can only go to one Being with one name or else it will not work!
The only sure way for that being to get the glory for anything, is for him to have a name above every name and
no one else can have that name, or there is confusion!
The Almighty is not the author of confusion!
Name Baptized Singular
To be baptized properly is very important!
Acts 10:43 KJV [43] To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission
of sins.
Mark 16:16 KJV [16] He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth
not shall be damned.
Mark 16:16 KJV [16] He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he
that believeth not shall be damned.
Luke 7:30 KJV [30] But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel
of God against themselves, being not baptized of him.
Luke 24:45-47 The messiah opened his disciples understanding and told them to "begin at Jerusalem", and preach repentance and remission of sins in his name (singular)!
[45] "Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, [46] And said unto
them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: [47] And
that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
He is not contradicting himself when he says in Matthew 28:19, "baptizing them in the name (singular) of the
father and of the son and of the Holy Spirit."
Acts 2:38 shows they began at Jerusalem, and how the apostles
interpreted the command and carried it out, i.e. in one "single name".
[38] Then Peter said unto
them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name (singular) of Jesus Christ for the "remission of
sins", and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
(they were commanded in Matthew 28:19 to baptized
in the name (singular) of the father and of the Son. Where is the Father's name in the above? Did the apostles disobey
the command? Or is there one single name of the Father and Son, like Matthew 28:19 says?
Acts 2:41 "Then
they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls."
Acts 8:12 KJV [12] But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom
of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
Acts 8:16 KJV [16] (For
as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name (singular) of the Lord Jesus.)
Acts 8:38 KJV [38] And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip
and the eunuch; and he baptized him
Acts 9:18 KJV [18] And immediately there fell from his eyes as it
had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized.
Acts 10:48 "And he
commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord."
(again, we see only one (singular) name.) there
is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of anyone ever baptizing in more than one name, and yet the apostles baptized
in the name (singular) of the father and of the son, or else they disobeyed the command in Matthew 28:19, therefore the
father and the son has to have the same name YHWH.)
Acts 16:33 KJV [33] And he took them the same
hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway.
Acts 19:3-5 KJV [3] And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. [4] Then said Paul,
John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which
should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. [5] When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Acts 19:4-5 KJV [4] Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying
unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. [5] When they
heard this , they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Acts 22:16 KJV [16] And now why tarriest
thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.
Acts 22:12-16 KJV [12] And one Ananias, a devout man according to the law, having a good report of all the Jews which dwelt there , [13] Came unto me, and stood, and said unto me, Brother Saul, receive thy sight. And the same hour I looked up upon
him. [14] And he said, The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know his will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of his mouth. [15] For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen
and heard. [16] And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.
Romans 6:3 KJV [3] Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized
into his death?
1 Corinthians 1:12-13 KJV [12] Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul;
and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. [13] Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were
ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Galatians 3:27 KJV [27] For as many of you as have been baptized
into Christ have put on Christ.
Galatians 3:28 KJV [28] There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Revelation
14:1 KJV [1] And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand,
having his Father's name written in their foreheads.
Revelation 22:4 KJV [4] And they shall see
his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
Acts 2:25 name YHWH
On the day of Pentecost
in the second chapter Acts, Peter explains how about 120 people were not drunk as accused, but was filled with the Holy Spirit spoken of by the prophet Joel, Verse 16 through 21.
Peter sums up Joel by saying that whosoever calls
on the name YHWH shall be saved in verse 21.
Peter goes on to explain how that they crucified the Messiah
and that the almighty raised him up, And explains what David said about him in verse 23 through 27, which I will
come back to in a moment, Especially verse 25.
Peter continuous saying how that David has not ascended into
the heavens but the Messiah has, and that the Almighty made him both Lord and Christ.
After hearing all
this, the people asked what must they do?
Peter tells them that everyone of them must repent and be baptized
in a certain name. Acts 2:38.
Most bibles has the name Je-sus there but it is evident that the name YHWH
belongs here, not only because Peter has already quoted Joel, telling them that the saving name to call on in the last
days was YHWH, but verse 25 actually proves that David said the Messiah's name was YHWH!
Peter says that David spoke concerning him, and quotes Psalm 16:8, Which clearly shows that David called the messiah YHWH, And this is the
that belongs in verse 38!
Romans 10:9-16 clearly explains that the son's name is YHWH
Name
The Son had the fathers name, not because the sons name had a form of the fathers name mixed with
the word for salvation in it, but because the son "was" the Saviour/deliver.
In other words he
is The Almighty's Savior for the people. The prophets had a name that "meant" something but Son had the name
and "was" that something. He "was" his name I.e. SAVIOUR!
All the prophet's names that had the short form of the father's name in it, was not names above every name.
Acts 15:26 KJV [26]
Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Not only is the son to be
named after the father but also a mountain of that Abraham was on and also a city and I believe it all.
I have a business that is called by my name and I also have a son that is called by my name what's wrong with having
two things called by your name?
If we can believe that a city is call by his name and A mountain call by
his name why not the son of the Almighty called by his name?
My name is Arnold I have a septic company called
Arnold's shit I have a son named Arnold just because I have a company named Arnold's doesn't Maine my son name is not
on that same think what some imply.
Why was the mountain named that and why was the city named that? Those who have not denied my name revelations
Whose name alone is holy! Psalms 148:13 says his name alone
is excellent! Psalm 8 also!
The name is not in the power but the power is in the name
You could argue that the name Joshua is in the New Testament, Before it was Jesus
The same translators mistranslated
the fathers name, in the same New Testament, so why not the sons name deceitfully
The Father had to
have a different name to separate him from other gods and the son had to have a name different than ever name that
is named under heaven to separate him from other men!!!!!!!!
What if you had three other gods named YHWH,
then which one created the heavens and the earth? Same with the son of Elohim. if you had three man named name
of the sun which one died for us?
Try to manage and three or four other gods with the same name as the
true God YHWH
I believe when you get out of the name the chain is broken. You might not want it to be but
the chain is broken to the one who shed his blood for you.
Acts 9:15 says bind all that call on thy name! Paul must suffer for the name sake
If my people which are called by my name shows that people call by the
name Yahweh, same as his son and the family name Paul spoke of!
Psalms 118:26 says blessed is he that cometh
in the name of the Lord and the little children quoted this burgers when he came riding on the dunking
Acts X4: 17 thank beat them and said speak no more in this name
When you're in the truth you do not have
to write volumes trying to explain away what Scripture clearly says, and I like that!
Yahshua did not die
for you.
You might say it doesn't matter what you call him, But if it is true then you could call him by the
traditional name! If there is nothing wrong with calling him so-and-so and there's nothing wrong with calling him Jesus.
You can't believe in the only begotten son without knowing his name!!!!
Suppose there
are many people out there in the world, Thousands name to Theus and thousands name that and thousands name something
nails consisting of thousands of names of every name under heaven, Including the name that you use for our Savior,
how would you know which one done the deed???
There would be absolutely no white" and give glory and
honor to do one who's done the date.
And someone done something spectacular very special but you would not know specifically which one of the many people done this unique deed because there were a bunch of people by that name.
Suppose there was one person out there who had a different name from all the rest, a name that is above every name that is named and this name is the one who done the special deed, Hey would be patiently addenda fat by his name
given glory and honor to the one who done the spectacular deed,
The prayer of the Messiah was father who art
in heaven HALLOW be thy name!
Simply List all the Scriptures about the name and challenging anyone
to try to explain each and everyone of them away
Name speak no Moore in this name.
They name
is not mentioned in the New Testament, we see this when we look at the scripture and then look in the New Testament whether it be the father or the sun's name, which is the same nine.
I must prove that the tradition of not
saying the Name YHWH was practiced during the time of the New Testament!
This would explain why the
name Joshua is used instead of the name that the father gave his son, because they had no problem using the name
Joshua but they did have a problem using the name of the father and his son. (YHWH)
We understand they had
a tradition not to say the fathers name YHWH, but why did they forbid anyone to speak the sons name? Could it be because
it was the same name as the father, Jeremiah 23:6???
There is sufficient evidence in the book of acts that
the name of the son (YHWH) was not to be spoken, taught, or used, even though notable miracles were done in the name,
the tradition not to speak it, was stronger than anything else, Including the miracles that was done in that name.
Part of his mission was to make the father's name known back to the people.
During the time of the
New Testament there was a tradition not to speak the fathers name, but now we're seeing that they did not want the
name of the son spoken either, could it be be because they had the same name???
Had the saviors name been
any other name other than the father's name, I don't believe they would have any problem saying it!
The son could not have been called Joshua, or any form of it, because if that was the case they would not have commanded to
people not to speak that name! Lunar Sabbaths is one of the most provable doctrines
found in scripture and one of the hardest to get people to take an honest look at. Lunar
Sabbaths not only can be conclusively proven from Scripture but Mathematically,
Historically, Scientifically, and from Nature itself,
The evidence provided here will prove
that the true weekly seventh day Sabbath of the scriptures is always observed on the same days of the Moon each month, and
that is on the 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th. The author offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who can pinpoint
a weekly Sabbath on any other day than by the moon.
We have pinpointed ( in scrupture) seventy two (72) weekly
Sabbath days, observed by the holy men of old, and every one of them is on either the 8th, 15th, 22nd, or 29th day of the
Moon, without exception. The reason for this is that they never counted the New Moon worship day when counting out the six
workdays.
In examining the evidence set forth in this work, you will see the true Sabbath comes after the six
workdays of the week, and the New Moon worship day is not one of the six ordinary work days, no more than the Sabbath
day is. . A new week always began after the New moon worship day or the wekly Sabbath worship day, they are both worship days,
and not one of the six work days. Ezech 46:1 says, "Thus saith the YHWH; The gate of the inner court that looketh
toward the east shall be "shut" the "six working day;" but on the "sabbath" it shall be opened,
"and" in the day of the "new moon" it shall be opened. YHWH describes 3 catagory of days, BOTH New
moon and Sabbaths are differant than ordinary work days, they are BOTH worship days and the 1st day of the week begins after
the New moon or Sabbath worship day. Isa. - 66:23 From one New moon to another and from one Sabbath to another shall
all flesh come and worship before me saith YHWH.
This and the following explains why the Sabbath days in the scriptures
are always on the 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th of the month,without exception. It is exciting to read the examples set forth
in this work based on the oldest history book in the world, and the only inspired one. For now you can go to http://lunarsabbath.info/ Or http://www.lunarsabbath.org/ Or http://www.angelfire.com/gundam/hypnautechs/ |