YHWH Name
The Father and his Son has the very same name (YHWH)!
Jeremiah
23:6 is very specific as to what the name of the Son is!
YHWH is one and his
name is one!
If there were many gods with the name YHWH, which one would you
be calling on for salvation?
But if
there was only one YHWH and his name one,
it would separate him from all the others and give him glory for
everything!
His name is who he is! He is his name!
The same is true with
his son! Only one person can have the
son's name, and that is the son!
There
is only one name under heaven and there cannot be two names under
heaven! For
salvation!
There cannot be several people with the son's name, no more then
there can be
several gods with the father's name!
Only 1 name of one person
will hook you up with the one who shed his
blood for you!
The glory and
praise can only go to one Being with one name or else it will not work!
The
only sure way for that being to get the glory for anything, is for him to have a
name above every name and
no one else can have that name, or there is
confusion!
The Almighty is not the author of confusion!
Name Baptized
Singular
To be baptized properly is very important!
Acts 10:43 KJV
[43]
To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth
in him shall receive remission
of sins.
Mark 16:16 KJV
[16] He that
believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth
not shall be
damned.
Mark 16:16 KJV
[16] He that believeth and is baptized shall be
saved; but he
that believeth not shall be damned.
Luke 7:30 KJV
[30] But the
Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel
of God against themselves, being not
baptized of him.
Luke 24:45-47 The messiah opened his disciples understanding
and told them to "begin at Jerusalem", and preach repentance and remission of
sins in his name (singular)!
[45] "Then opened he their understanding, that
they might understand the scriptures, [46] And said unto
them, Thus it is
written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the
third day: [47] And
that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in
his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
He is not contradicting
himself when he says in Matthew 28:19, "baptizing them in the name (singular) of
the
father and of the son and of the Holy Spirit."
Acts 2:38 shows they began
at Jerusalem, and how the apostles
interpreted the command and carried it out,
i.e. in one "single name".
[38] Then Peter said unto
them, Repent, and be
baptized every one of you in the name (singular) of Jesus Christ for the
"remission of
sins", and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
(they
were commanded in Matthew 28:19 to baptized
in the name (singular) of the father
and of the Son. Where is the Father's name in the above? Did the apostles
disobey
the command? Or is there one single name of the Father and Son, like
Matthew 28:19 says?
Acts 2:41 "Then
they that gladly received his word were
baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand
souls."
Acts 8:12 KJV
[12] But when they believed Philip preaching the
things concerning the kingdom
of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were
baptized, both men and women.
Acts 8:16 KJV
[16] (For
as yet he was fallen
upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name (singular) of the Lord
Jesus.)
Acts 8:38 KJV
[38] And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and
they went down both into the water, both Philip
and the eunuch; and he baptized
him
Acts 9:18 KJV
[18] And immediately there fell from his eyes as it
had
been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was
baptized.
Acts 10:48 "And he
commanded them to be baptized in the name of the
Lord."
(again, we see only one (singular) name.) there
is absolutely no
evidence whatsoever of anyone ever baptizing in more than one name, and yet the
apostles baptized
in the name (singular) of the father and of the son, or else
they disobeyed the command in Matthew 28:19, therefore the
father and the son
has to have the same name YHWH.)
Acts 16:33 KJV
[33] And he took them the
same
hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all
his, straightway.
Acts 19:3-5 KJV
[3] And he said unto them, Unto what then
were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. [4] Then said Paul,
John
verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that
they should believe on him which
should come after him, that is, on Christ
Jesus. [5] When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord
Jesus.
Acts 19:4-5 KJV
[4] Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the
baptism of repentance, saying
unto the people, that they should believe on him
which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. [5] When they
heard this
, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Acts 22:16 KJV
[16] And
now why tarriest
thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling
on the name of the Lord.
Acts 22:12-16 KJV
[12] And one Ananias, a devout
man according to the law, having a good report of all the Jews which dwelt there
, [13] Came unto me, and stood, and said unto me, Brother Saul, receive thy
sight. And the same hour I looked up upon
him. [14] And he said, The God of our
fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know his will, and see that Just
One, and shouldest hear the voice of his mouth. [15] For thou shalt be his
witness unto all men of what thou hast seen
and heard. [16] And now why tarriest
thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the
Lord.
Romans 6:3 KJV
[3] Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized
into Jesus Christ were baptized
into his death?
1 Corinthians 1:12-13
KJV
[12] Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul;
and I of
Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. [13] Is Christ divided? was Paul
crucified for you? or were
ye baptized in the name of Paul?
Galatians 3:27
KJV
[27] For as many of you as have been baptized
into Christ have put on
Christ.
Galatians 3:28 KJV
[28] There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is
neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in
Christ Jesus.
Revelation
14:1 KJV
[1] And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on
the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand,
having his
Father's name written in their foreheads.
Revelation 22:4 KJV
[4] And they
shall see
his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
Acts 2:25
name YHWH
On the day of Pentecost
in the second chapter Acts, Peter explains
how about 120 people were not drunk as accused, but was filled with the Holy
Spirit spoken of by the prophet Joel, Verse 16 through 21.
Peter sums up Joel
by saying that whosoever calls
on the name YHWH shall be saved in verse
21.
Peter goes on to explain how that they crucified the Messiah
and that the
almighty raised him up, And explains what David said about him in verse 23
through 27, which I will
come back to in a moment, Especially verse 25.
Peter
continuous saying how that David has not ascended into
the heavens but the
Messiah has, and that the Almighty made him both Lord and Christ.
After
hearing all
this, the people asked what must they do?
Peter tells them that
everyone of them must repent and be baptized
in a certain name. Acts
2:38.
Most bibles has the name Je-sus there but it is evident that the name
YHWH
belongs here, not only because Peter has already quoted Joel, telling them
that the saving name to call on in the last
days was YHWH, but verse 25 actually
proves that David said the Messiah's name was YHWH!
Peter says that David
spoke concerning him, and quotes Psalm 16:8, Which clearly shows that David
called the messiah YHWH, And this is the
that belongs in verse 38!
Romans
10:9-16 clearly explains that the son's name is YHWH
Name
The Son had
the fathers name, not because the sons name had a form of the fathers name mixed
with
the word for salvation in it, but because the son "was" the
Saviour/deliver.
In other words he
is The Almighty's Savior for the people.
The prophets had a name that "meant" something but Son had the name
and "was"
that something. He "was" his name I.e. SAVIOUR!
All the prophet's names that
had the short form of the father's name in it, was not names above every
name.
Acts 15:26 KJV
[26]
Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of
our Lord Jesus Christ.
Not only is the son to be
named after the father but
also a mountain of that Abraham was on and also a city and I believe it
all.
I have a business that is called by my name and I also have a son that
is called by my name what's wrong with having
two things called by your
name?
If we can believe that a city is call by his name and A mountain call
by
his name why not the son of the Almighty called by his name?
My name is
Arnold I have a septic company called
Arnold's shit I have a son named Arnold
just because I have a company named Arnold's doesn't Maine my son name is not
on
that same think what some imply.
Why was the mountain named that and why was
the city named that?
Those who have not denied my name revelations
Whose
name alone is holy! Psalms 148:13 says his name alone
is excellent! Psalm 8
also!
The name is not in the power but the power is in the name
You could
argue that the name Joshua is in the New Testament, Before it was Jesus
The
same translators mistranslated
the fathers name, in the same New Testament, so
why not the sons name deceitfully
The Father had to
have a different name to
separate him from other gods and the son had to have a name different than ever
name that
is named under heaven to separate him from other men!!!!!!!!
What
if you had three other gods named YHWH,
then which one created the heavens and
the earth? Same with the son of Elohim. if you had three man named name
of the
sun which one died for us?
Try to manage and three or four other gods with
the same name as the
true God YHWH
I believe when you get out of the name the
chain is broken. You might not want it to be but
the chain is broken to the one
who shed his blood for you.
Acts 9:15 says bind all that call on thy name!
Paul must suffer for the name sake
If my people which are called by my name
shows that people call by the
name Yahweh, same as his son and the family name
Paul spoke of!
Psalms 118:26 says blessed is he that cometh
in the name of
the Lord and the little children quoted this burgers when he came riding on the
dunking
Acts X4: 17 thank beat them and said speak no more in this
name
When you're in the truth you do not have
to write volumes trying to
explain away what Scripture clearly says, and I like that!
Yahshua did not
die
for you.
You might say it doesn't matter what you call him, But if it is
true then you could call him by the
traditional name! If there is nothing wrong
with calling him so-and-so and there's nothing wrong with calling him
Jesus.
You can't believe in the only begotten son without knowing his
name!!!!
Suppose there
are many people out there in the world, Thousands name
to Theus and thousands name that and thousands name something
nails consisting
of thousands of names of every name under heaven, Including the name that you
use for our Savior,
how would you know which one done the deed???
There would
be absolutely no white" and give glory and
honor to do one who's done the
date.
And someone done something spectacular very special but you would not
know specifically which one of the many people done this unique deed because
there were a bunch of people by that name.
Suppose there was one person out
there who had a different name from all the rest, a name that is above every
name that is named and this name is the one who done the special deed, Hey would
be patiently addenda fat by his name
given glory and honor to the one who done
the spectacular deed,
The prayer of the Messiah was father who art
in heaven
HALLOW be thy name!
Simply List all the Scriptures about the name and
challenging anyone
to try to explain each and everyone of them away
Name
speak no Moore in this name.
They name
is not mentioned in the New Testament,
we see this when we look at the scripture and then look in the New Testament
whether it be the father or the sun's name, which is the same nine.
I must
prove that the tradition of not
saying the Name YHWH was practiced during the
time of the New Testament!
This would explain why the
name Joshua is used
instead of the name that the father gave his son, because they had no problem
using the name
Joshua but they did have a problem using the name of the father
and his son. (YHWH)
We understand they had
a tradition not to say the fathers
name YHWH, but why did they forbid anyone to speak the sons name? Could it be
because
it was the same name as the father, Jeremiah 23:6???
There is
sufficient evidence in the book of acts that
the name of the son (YHWH) was not
to be spoken, taught, or used, even though notable miracles were done in the
name,
the tradition not to speak it, was stronger than anything else, Including
the miracles that was done in that name.
Part of his mission was to make the
father's name known back to the people.
During the time of the
New Testament
there was a tradition not to speak the fathers name, but now we're seeing that
they did not want the
name of the son spoken either, could it be be because they
had the same name???
Had the saviors name been
any other name other than the
father's name, I don't believe they would have any problem saying it!
The son
could not have been called Joshua, or any form of it, because if that was the
case they would not have commanded to
people not to speak that name! Lunar Sabbaths is one of the most provable doctrines
found in scripture and one of the hardest to get people to take an honest look at. Lunar
Sabbaths not only can be conclusively proven from Scripture but Mathematically,
Historically, Scientifically, and from Nature itself,
The evidence provided here will prove
that the true weekly seventh day Sabbath of the scriptures is always observed on the same days of the Moon each month, and
that is on the 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th. The author offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who can pinpoint
a weekly Sabbath on any other day than by the moon.
We have pinpointed ( in scrupture) seventy two (72) weekly
Sabbath days, observed by the holy men of old, and every one of them is on either the 8th, 15th, 22nd, or 29th day of the
Moon, without exception. The reason for this is that they never counted the New Moon worship day when counting out the six
workdays.
In examining the evidence set forth in this work, you will see the true Sabbath comes after the six
workdays of the week, and the New Moon worship day is not one of the six ordinary work days, no more than the Sabbath
day is. . A new week always began after the New moon worship day or the wekly Sabbath worship day, they are both worship days,
and not one of the six work days. Ezech 46:1 says, "Thus saith the YHWH; The gate of the inner court that looketh
toward the east shall be "shut" the "six working day;" but on the "sabbath" it shall be opened,
"and" in the day of the "new moon" it shall be opened. YHWH describes 3 catagory of days, BOTH New
moon and Sabbaths are differant than ordinary work days, they are BOTH worship days and the 1st day of the week begins after
the New moon or Sabbath worship day. Isa. - 66:23 From one New moon to another and from one Sabbath to another shall
all flesh come and worship before me saith YHWH.
This and the following explains why the Sabbath days in the scriptures
are always on the 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th of the month,without exception. It is exciting to read the examples set forth
in this work based on the oldest history book in the world, and the only inspired one. For now you can go to http://lunarsabbath.info/ Or http://www.lunarsabbath.org/ Or http://www.angelfire.com/gundam/hypnautechs/ |
